Posts Tagged ‘Innovation’

Why Shadetree?

Tuesday, March 9th, 2010

We have a pretty bold mission.  We want to be transformational and catalytic.  We want to be a part of leading change in the world. We are solving a problem and meeting a need that we care about deeply.  Wait, let us refine that a bit.  We care in the sense that if we don’t solve it daily, we go home restless.  We couldn’t let it go–we couldn’t trust it to someone else.  We weren’t satisfied with the way the problem was being solved and the solutions that other companies were offering, or intended to offer.  That’s what has driven us for going on two years with this effort.

How do you know whether or not you care about the problem you’re working on?  Here’s our litmus test in part:

1.  First, define the problem you’re solving in reasonably broad terms.
2.  Then, answer yes or no to this:  If the problem was somehow magically “solved” (to your satisfaction), but you weren’t the one that solved it, would you be fine with it?

We have always said, “If one day we wake up and learn that somehow the problem has been magically solved — even if it was by a competitor, we are fine with that.”  Honestly, we would probably be a little miffed that they had beaten us, but still OK.  As long as they really solved it.  We could have stopped toiling away the sleepless nights working on that particular problem and we would have found other problems to work on.

The concept here is:  You care enough about a problem that you don’t necessarily mind if someone else solves it.  What really frustrates us entrepreneurs is when competitors win, but they don’t actually solve the problem.

One way to explain this concept better is to look at an extreme example.  Lets say the problem you were working on was curing cancer.  Of course, you’d be passionate about finding a cure.  You’d be working hard.  It’s an important problem, and it’s not surprising that you care.  Now, imagine if you woke up one day to learn that someone else had created a cure.  You’d be glad that the problem was solved — even though it wasn’t you that solved it.  Sure, it would have been great to get the fame and glory, but that surely wouldn’t cause you to wish the other scientists/researchers/doctors ill.  Nope.  You’d wish them well.  Why?  Because fundamentally, you care about having the problem solved.

Now, if someone else ends up doing it, and winds up delivering on our mission, well, then, more power to them. We care enough about the problem that we don’t mind if someone else solves it.  That’s why we truly wish our “competitors” well.  But know, just because we wish them well doesn’t mean we’re going to make it easy for them.  After all, like you, we are entrepreneurs and as such, fair but fiercely competitive.

Summary:  When possible, work on really big problems.  They’re more fun, and it’s easier to get excited.  But, even if you’re not working on a really big problem, it’s OK, as long as you at least care enough about the problem you are solving that you don’t care who solves it.  You just want it solved.

If this appeals to where you are…please join us. We are live in April and there is plenty of problem for all of us to work on together here.

TEDActive's Innovation Lounge

Monday, February 15th, 2010

One of the coolest conferences that happens every year has just wrapped up as you read this post. It’s the TED conference. This eclectic gathering of the world’s leading minds presenting “Ideas worth spreading”–often turn out the most innovative and thought provoking approaches to common problems of our world and culture today. The panelists are wide and varied (this year was no exception). You can always count on brilliance coming out. We encourage you to visit the site, and in the days to come, we will post a comment follow-up for the TED YouTube videos that will be released. Promise, at least one will be worth your time =)

Dimensional Idea Capture

“We’ve taken all the topics that have come up in all the TEDTalks from the past few years on the website, and by moving your hand above this box you’ll be able to look see the ideas that people are writing about TED as they’re happening from the Twitter feed. You can control the movement and capture ideas in the aerogel as they’re coming back.” — Gilad Lotan

Software-Controlled Art

“This is a piece by the video and new-media artist Lincoln Schatz. It’s a generative portrait. We created this especially for the space here. It started Monday; we plugged it in, and that’s its ‘born-on date.’ That’s when it started collecting memories. … The software makes all the decisions about what it wants to keep and what it wants to discard. It’s a portrait, but the artist surrenders control to the software.” — Nell Taylor

The Death of Innovation

Sunday, May 17th, 2009

We had the honor of having our friend Mike Gold, CIO at Willow Creek, in town last week and a funny/intriguing conversation started in the car on the way back from eating some world class BBQ. In the middle of a conversation about software and future project development we all realized there was a bad taste in our mouth. No, not from the BBQ, it was this word that kept coming up that seemed to have no definition anymore. It became apparent that if enough people say the word out of contexxt that a word can actually grow to have no meaning at all.

We had reached a cross-roads with our friend. Our friend, the word, Innovation. What does it even really mean to be innovative? To build something innovative? To be an innovator? Can you actually know that you are being innovative? Is it a purposeful decision that is made that is then followed by innovation? I don’t think so. Good old Webster’s says that innovation means:

in⋅no⋅va⋅tion

[in-uh-vey-shuhn]
–noun
1.something new or different introduced: numerous innovations in the high-school curriculum.
2.the act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods.

When reading this I don’t know if innovation should be something that we are externally. Imagine if Apple had been innovative and introduced the idea of the multi-touch, face-rocking phone, but that was where it stopped. Let’s all assume that if we want our businesses/ministries/churches to grow then we better be innovative. At least to a certain to degree. If you are not being innovative, then what is the point.

Ok. So we have decided that being innovative is now assumed. So what do we say then? What is it that we are really trying to say? Mike suggested the phrase “Game Changing”. That phrase had some serious impact on me. Being a creative guy, I could immediately picture the scenario of a game changing performance. I started seeing scenes from some of my favorite movies and epic sporting events that were truly game changing. It was easy for me to get on board with.

So why is game changing better than innovation? Well to me game changing forces an action. You can’t influence change without actually doing something, and that is what I feel like has been missing. If you have an idea that is innovative, then get on it. Be a game changer and make your innovative idea come to life. Build it up and release it out. See where it goes. Lay the path.

Here are some other words/phrases that have also made my personal “dead to me” list:
1. Phat
2. Off the hook/chain
3. Legit
4. Bogus
5. Crunk
6. Innovative
7. Out of the Box
8. Funky
9. Chillax
10. Radical (has been replaced with “Rad”)